


The movie is also a critique on the old fashioned Japanese type of honor. The Colonel, the figure responsible for the program that performed experiments on the children, is a figure who believes the miiltary should be the sole authority of a city that is ridden in gangs and corruption. He can be compared to an anachronistic shogun who believes the samurai code should continue to thrive in the light of new developments in civil rights and technology.
Below is a parody by Harry Partridge of the American production of Akira that will be coming in 2011. Yes, that's right. An American production of Akira. In 2011. Wonder how that will turn out...I sorely apologize that the screen is rather squished on the blog.
- Kristopher
The same philosophy used on the bomb could be used on the people responsible for pressing the red button for a nuclear weapon, a set of cluster bombs or a "bunker buster." Why do we explode? Why do we blow stuff up? The movie implies we just do to see something burst into a watercolor painting of napalm and charred chunks flying (or floating) all over the place.
Coming to think of it, people usually say violence in real life is not a good idea but then we enjoy movies like The Terminator, anime and manga like Hellsing that glorifies itself in dark humor and bloodshed and video games like Devil May Cry that congratulates the player on killing monsters in a fantastic fashion. Is Dark Star a satire of destruction, or does it just poke fun as "space opera" elements without regarding to deeper meanings?
Considering how "spaced out" the movie is (According to the poster at the beginning of this post), I would say we should not care what the movie is trying to tell us. Beach ball aliens and talking bombs just do not make any sense. Till then, surf's up!
Come aboard the this ship and learn what's been going on in my science fiction literature and film class. No space helmet required!